| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|\
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
Conflicts:
ChangeLog
configure.ac
doc/manual.html
runtime/rsyslog.h
tcpsrv.c
|
| |\
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | | |
Conflicts:
ChangeLog
configure.ac
doc/manual.html
|
| | | |
|
| | |\
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | | |
Conflicts:
runtime/rsyslog.h
|
| | | | |
|
| | | | |
|
| | |\ \
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | | |
Conflicts:
runtime/rsyslog.h
tools/syslogd.c
|
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | | |
improperly handled.
This was a regression of one of the last bugfixes, so no previously released
version contained this bug (thus it does not show up in the ChangeLog).
|
| | |\| |
| | | |/
| | |/|
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | | |
Conflicts:
configure.ac
doc/manual.html
runtime/datetime.h
runtime/parser.c
runtime/rsyslog.h
tools/syslogd.c
v4-stable had a bug with RFC5424-formatted structured data, which showed
was detected by the enhanced automatted testbench of v4-beta.
|
| | | |\ |
|
| | | | |\ |
|
| | | | | | |
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | | |
Until now, they were forwarded to processing, but this makes no sense
Also, it looks like the system seems to provide a zero return code
on a UDP recvfrom() from time to time for some internal reasons. These
"receives" are now silently ignored.
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | | |
could lead to mis-addressing and potential memory corruption/segfault
|
| | | | | | |
|
| | | | | | |
|
|\ \ \ \ \ \
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
Conflicts:
ChangeLog
configure.ac
doc/manual.html
|
| |\ \ \ \ \ \
| | | |/ / / /
| | |/| | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
Conflicts:
ChangeLog
configure.ac
doc/manual.html
|
| | | | | | | |
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
we needed to release ALL resources (including file handles!) only
after the the async writer thread has terminated (else it may access
them). In this case, we had a file handle leak, because the handle was
sometimes only opened in the async writer, but the close was attempted
before the writer even started (in some cases).
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
...after we seem to have identified the root cause of the segfault.
I leave them commented out so that we can re-activate it if need
arises (aka "get some practice drill first").
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
Most severely affected omfile. The problem was that some buffers were
freed before the asynchronous writer thread was shut down. So the
writer thread accessed invalid data, which may even already be
overwritten. Symptoms (with omfile) were segfaults, grabled data
and files with random names placed around the file system (most
prominently into the root directory). Special thanks to Aaron for
helping to track this down.
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
if the buffer was too small, we would see more API calls, but no
failure, so this is no fix!
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
Problems could lead to abort and/or memory leak. The module is now hardened in a very
conservative way, which is sub-optimal from a performance point of view. This should
be improved if it has proven reliable in practice.
|
| | | | | | | |
|
| | | | | | | |
|
| | | | | | | |
|
| |\| | | | | |
|
| | | | | | | |
|
| | | | | | | |
|
| | | | | | | |
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
permits to prevent startup when there are problems with the configuration
file. See it's doc for details.
|
| | | | | | | |
|
| | | | | | | |
|
| | | | | | | |
|
|\ \ \ \ \ \ \
| | |_|/ / / /
| |/| | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
Conflicts:
configure.ac
|
| |\ \ \ \ \ \
| | | |/ / / /
| | |/| | | | |
|
| | | | | | | |
|
|\ \ \ \ \ \ \ |
|
| | | | | | | | |
|
| |\ \ \ \ \ \ \ |
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
This shall provide slightly better performance (just slightly because we called
select() rather infrequently on a busy system).
|
| | | | | | | | | |
|
|\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \
| |_|/ / / / / / /
|/| | / / / / / /
| | |/ / / / / /
| |/| | | | | | |
|
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
See ticket for details: http://bugzilla.adiscon.com/show_bug.cgi?id=150
|
| |\ \ \ \ \ \ \
| | | |/ / / / /
| | |/| | | | | |
|
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
backport from v5-devel
|
|\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \
| | |_|_|/ / / /
| |/| | | | | | |
|
| |\ \ \ \ \ \ \
| | | |/ / / / /
| | |/| | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
Conflicts:
action.c
|
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
this could lead to loss of the repeated message content. As a side-
effect, it could probably also be possible that some segfault occurs
(quite unlikely). The root cause was that some counters introduced
during the malloc optimizations were not properly duplicated in
MsgDup(). Note that repeated message processing is not enabled
by default.
|