From 47a2593ae4e2d4077b4a9e8c77a2b686abfa8d2c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Rainer Gerhards Date: Tue, 23 Sep 2008 14:41:02 +0200 Subject: atomic memory access calls re-enabled in msg.c destructor not yet permitted because verification is missing that a atomic opration is sufficient for the job required --- runtime/msg.c | 10 +++++----- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) (limited to 'runtime') diff --git a/runtime/msg.c b/runtime/msg.c index 346bbc5f..d5e1fde9 100644 --- a/runtime/msg.c +++ b/runtime/msg.c @@ -273,12 +273,12 @@ BEGINobjDestruct(msg) /* be sure to specify the object type also in END and CODE int currRefCount; CODESTARTobjDestruct(msg) /* DEV Debugging only ! dbgprintf("msgDestruct\t0x%lx, Ref now: %d\n", (unsigned long)pM, pM->iRefCount - 1); */ -# ifdef DO_HAVE_ATOMICS - currRefCount = ATOMIC_DEC_AND_FETCH(pThis->iRefCount); -# else +//# ifdef DO_HAVE_ATOMICS +// currRefCount = ATOMIC_DEC_AND_FETCH(pThis->iRefCount); +//# else MsgLock(pThis); currRefCount = --pThis->iRefCount; -# endif +//# endif // we need a mutex, because we may be suspended after getting the refcount but before if(currRefCount == 0) { @@ -487,7 +487,7 @@ finalize_it: msg_t *MsgAddRef(msg_t *pM) { assert(pM != NULL); -# ifdef DO_HAVE_ATOMICS +# ifdef HAVE_ATOMIC_BUILTINS ATOMIC_INC(pM->iRefCount); # else MsgLock(pM); -- cgit v1.2.3